Cases & Investigations
EACO Corp. Derivative Litigation
Type: Current Cases
Case Number: CACE 24-012180
Defendant(s): Glen F. Ceiley, William L. Means, Stephen Catanzaro, Ellen S. Bancroft, Donald S. Wagner
Stock Symbol: EACO
Court: Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida
The lawsuit was filed after an inspection of EACO’s internal books and records by Alluvial and Wolf Popper. The Verified Stockholder Derivative Complaint alleges that the Company’s October 2023 purchase of its headquarters building (the “Property”) for $31 million from a trust owned and controlled by Ceiley was grossly unfair to EACO in terms of both price and process, resulting in significant financial losses for the company. The Complaint alleges that the $31 million purchase price for the Property was inflated by millions of dollars above fair market value.
Among other things, the Complaint alleges that Ceiley violated Fla. Stat. § 607.0832 (Directors Conflict of Interest) by failing to ensure that the price paid for the Property was comparable to what might have been obtained in an arm’s length transaction. The Complaint also claims that Ceiley breached the fiduciary duties he owed to EACO under Florida law by, among other things, selling the Property to EACO at a materially inflated price, and that Means, Catanzaro, and Bancroft breached the fiduciary duties they owed to EACO by, among other things, approving the purchase of the Property and failing to properly supervise and evaluate the purchase of the Property, which was an obvious conflicted transaction between the Company and its CEO, Chairman, and 96% Controlling Stockholder. In addition, the Complaint alleges that Means, Catanzaro, Bancroft, and Wagner aided and abetted Ceiley’s violations of Fla. Stat. § 607.0832, and that Wagner aided and abetted Ceiley, Means, Catanzaro, and Bancroft’s breaches of fiduciary duties.
The lawsuit seeks to hold Ceiley, the board members, and Wagner accountable for these statutory breaches and fiduciary failures, demanding that they reimburse EACO for the financial damages caused by the inflated property purchase. The estimated overpayment, based on inflated valuation metrics, represents a significant loss to the company and underscores severe governance failures among EACO’s leadership and directors.
The case is Alluvial Fund, LP v. Glen F. Ceiley, et al., pending in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, Florida.
Contact Instructions
Phone: Joshua W. Ruthizer - (212) 451-9668
Phone: Emer C. Burke - (212) 451-9625
Email: Outreach@wolfpopper.com
Case Update | 8/22/2024